Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!
Kony2012
#1
Posted 07 March 2012 - 06:53 AM
If you haven't heard of it, the idea is everyone watches this video:
and then you share it to raise awareness of the cause. To summarize this video: there's a guy in Uganda called Joseph Kony who is the leader of a rebel group that's feared by many for good reason. He takes children away from their families and uses/abuses them as his own army (a 30k strong army of children), getting them to kill others and their own parents, mutilate other children and other unspeakable actions. There's no doubt whatsoever that this guy is a disgusting man and action needs to be taken against him. This video is made by a group called 'Invisible children' who want to spread awareness by raising money to harrass the US government into doing something to help those soldiers in Uganda to catch Kony. They have also supposedly built schools and refuges for the kids in Uganda.
It's a very effective and emotional video, certainly. Many people on my facebook have become strong advocators of the cause overnight and take offence greatly to anyone who doesn't support Invisible Children. The video uses a number of strategic emotional ploys to gain sympathy, including the use of the Narrators very cute son, emotional conversations and pumped up figures. However something just seems a little bit off about the entire thing. If I had been less suspicious I probably would be one of the firm supporters, it sounds like a noble cause to catch an absolutely despicable man, however it leaves a lot to be desired and is in fact a ridiculously biased video. Kony himself for example, hasn't been active in Uganda since 2006.
Invisible Children as a company has VERY questionable motives and financial problems, all the opposition arguments can be found in the following links:
http://www.reddit.com/r/AskReddit/comments/qln68/am_i_the_only_one_who_is_suspicious_about/
http://www.wrongingrights.com/2009/03/worst-idea-ever.html (from 2006, THAT LONG AGO)
http://visiblechildren.tumblr.com/
All of these point out the fact that this whole deal isn't quite what it seems, people buying towards the 'charity' and not towards actually helping the capture of this criminal.
What are your thoughts on this?
As for me, I completely support the cause of stopping Kony but I don't think this is the correct way to go about it.
#2
Posted 07 March 2012 - 06:58 AM
Can a mod delete my topic, this one is better explained kthnx :3
edit: first step to any proper action is to raise awareness though right?
#3
Posted 07 March 2012 - 07:01 AM
Before everyone gets too much of a false sense of self righteousness about this KODY thing because they clicked like on a video, at least look at some other information.
ilto.wordpress.com/2006/11/02/the-visible-problem-with-invisible-children/
Kony has been out of Uganda for over half a decade. there are rumors that he is dead
www.topix.com/forum/city/stuart-fl/TQJSGHMES035Q6OI0
Invisble Children barely sends any of their revenue to the people they try to "help"
c2052482.r82.cf0.rackcdn.com/images/830/original/AR11_small_final.pdf?1323127778
an annual revenue report. go to page 19. ICgave 37% to the people, and spent the rest on different forms of advertising.
If you're going to champion a cause, at least educate yourself on what the fuck you're supporting. If the video made you stand up and want to make a difference in Africa, great. Send your money through an organisation that will send it to the people who need it instead of sending it to an organisation making flashy propaganda.
FUCK THIS SHIT IS ANNOYING AS FUCK.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_profilepage&v=QeO4Fyvb7CQ
This is amazing though
#4
Posted 07 March 2012 - 07:20 AM
If IC are a registered charity over in the US they'd be shut down or put under administration or something if their data was very clearly wrong, right?
#5
Posted 07 March 2012 - 08:46 AM
This is more of the disgusting Western Feel-Good pretend you're making a difference attitude that plagues West Europe, and the US.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfobLjsj230
http://www.stand-news.co.uk/kony-2012-the-worst-campaign/
#6
Posted 07 March 2012 - 10:45 AM
EDIT: These kinds of charities do disgust me though, such a high proportion goes towards advertising, or wages, or promotion, or whatever else. I'm aware it's difficult to run something on a massive scale where 100% of the money donated goes to the right places, but really, the figures they have are shocking. I can never justify charities where the CEOs are often paid as much as your average high ranking business man.
That said, I'm pretty interested to watch the video, given the controversy surrounding the filming itself. Also, great thread forzare, I was gonna make it too
This is a fairly interesting read Source, or quoted below:
For those asking what you can do to help, please link to visiblechildren.tumblr.com wherever you see KONY 2012 posts. And tweet a link to this page to famous people on Twitter who are talking about KONY 2012!
I do not doubt for a second that those involved in KONY 2012 have great intentions, nor do I doubt for a second that Joseph Kony is a very evil man. But despite this, I'm strongly opposed to the KONY 2012 campaign.
KONY 2012 is the product of a group called Invisible Children, a controversial activist group and not-for-profit. They've released 11 films, most with an accompanying bracelet colour (KONY 2012 is fittingly red), all of which focus on Joseph Kony. When we buy merch from them, when we link to their video, when we put up posters linking to their website, we support the organization. I don't think that's a good thing, and I'm not alone.
Invisible Children has been condemned time and time again. As a registered not-for-profit, its finances are public. Last year, the organization spent $8,676,614. Only 32% went to direct services (page 6), with much of the rest going to staff salaries, travel and transport, and film production. This is far from ideal, and Charity Navigator rates their accountability 2/4 stars because they haven't had their finances externally audited. But it goes way deeper than that.
The group is in favour of direct military intervention, and their money supports the Ugandan government's army and various other military forces. Here's a photo of the founders of Invisible Children posing with weapons and personnel of the Sudan People's Liberation Army. Both the Ugandan army and Sudan People's Liberation Army are riddled with accusations of rape and looting, but Invisible Children defends them, arguing that the Ugandan army is "better equipped than that of any of the other affected countries", although Kony is no longer active in Uganda and hasn't been since 2006 by their own admission. These books each refer to the rape and sexual assault that are perennial issues with the UPDF, the military group Invisible Children is defending.
Still, the bulk of Invisible Children's spending isn't on supporting African militias, but on awareness and filmmaking. Which can be great, except that Foreign Affairs has claimed that Invisible Children (among others) "manipulates facts for strategic purposes, exaggerating the scale of LRA abductions and murders and emphasizing the LRA's use of innocent children as soldiers, and portraying Kony — a brutal man, to be sure — as uniquely awful, a Kurtz-like embodiment of evil." He's certainly evil, but exaggeration and manipulation to capture the public eye is unproductive, unprofessional and dishonest.
As Chris Blattman, a political scientist at Yale, writes on the topic of IC's programming, "There's also something inherently misleading, naive, maybe even dangerous, about the idea of rescuing children or saving of Africa. […] It hints uncomfortably of the White Man's Burden. Worse, sometimes it does more than hint. The savior attitude is pervasive in advocacy, and it inevitably shapes programming. Usually misconceived programming."
Still, Kony's a bad guy, and he's been around a while. Which is why the US has been involved in stopping him for years. U.S. Africa Command (AFRICOM) has sent multiple missions to capture or kill Kony over the years. And they've failed time and time again, each provoking a ferocious response and increased retaliative slaughter. The issue with taking out a man who uses a child army is that his bodyguards are children. Any effort to capture or kill him will almost certainly result in many children's deaths, an impact that needs to be minimized as much as possible. Each attempt brings more retaliation. And yet Invisible Children supports military intervention. Kony has been involved in peace talks in the past, which have fallen through. But Invisible Children is now focusing on military intervention.
Military intervention may or may not be the right idea, but people supporting KONY 2012 probably don't realize they're supporting the Ugandan military who are themselves raping and looting away. If people know this and still support Invisible Children because they feel it's the best solution based on their knowledge and research, I have no issue with that. But I don't think most people are in that position, and that's a problem.
Is awareness good? Yes. But these problems are highly complex, not one-dimensional and, frankly, aren't of the nature that can be solved by postering, film-making and changing your Facebook profile picture, as hard as that is to swallow. Giving your money and public support to Invisible Children so they can spend it on supporting ill-advised violent intervention and movie #12 isn't helping. Do I have a better answer? No, I don't, but that doesn't mean that you should support KONY 2012 just because it's something. Something isn't always better than nothing. Sometimes it's worse.
If you want to write to your Member of Parliament or your Senator or the President or the Prime Minister, by all means, go ahead. If you want to post about Joseph Kony's crimes on Facebook, go ahead. But let's keep it about Joseph Kony, not KONY 2012.
#7
Posted 07 March 2012 - 10:55 AM
With that said of course I support raising awareness to force anyone ignorant higher up to notice but to me this seems a lot about something different.
#8
Posted 07 March 2012 - 11:05 AM
#9
Posted 07 March 2012 - 12:55 PM
Son of a bitch deserves to die !
Killing your family & being rapped..
I feel soo bad for all those families out there.
He needs to die A S A P.
#10
Posted 07 March 2012 - 01:17 PM
#11
Posted 07 March 2012 - 01:33 PM
Obviously the thread was tldr for you- FUCK KONY !
Son of a bitch deserves to die !
Killing your family & being rapped..
I feel soo bad for all those families out there.
He needs to die A S A P.
#12
Posted 07 March 2012 - 01:34 PM
KONY 2012 would be great if it did what it said on the tin but it doesn't and things aren't that simple.
When will Algernon come back and save the world?
#13
Posted 07 March 2012 - 02:24 PM
#14
Posted 07 March 2012 - 02:32 PM
I also think a lot of it is people genuinely not giving a fuck either way and just going along with whatever new group is posted on facebook and whatever is posted at the time. I doubt most people even watched the original video in full, and those that did probably didn't question it whatsoever. Perhaps I'm being cynical, but going off my facebook that's definitely how it seems to be.
Already the focus has switched from "this video is horrific we have to do something" to liking a ton of kony-related humour groups. I'm not going to lie though, the Liam Neeson one cracked me up. Liam Neeson will look for Kony, he will find him, and he will kill him!
also: @ death by pretzel, what? Algernon has never left. Still the same cranky bitter fuck. Some things truly never change.
#15
Posted 07 March 2012 - 02:38 PM
The same exact people who are screaming about being against violence, and being for world peace. It's a joke, really.
#16
Posted 07 March 2012 - 03:56 PM
#17
Posted 07 March 2012 - 06:20 PM
Sure you can feed them and build them schools and shelters, all for it to be raided and pillaged a in god knows when, again. Or just stop the people causing the chaos, makes it a bit hard then whey have child 'soldiers'. It's still better end the conflict now and have some collateral (none if possible but doubt that will happen) then let it drag on and the victims pile up.
Humanitarian organisations will probably have a media frenzy if child 'soldiers' are killed as a result, but it's stupid to put pressure on military just because of that. In the long run a lot more people die and suffer cause people with a 'soft spot' fling their moral values all over the place.
Shame Africa doesn't have large oil reserves, America would be all over that shit by now.
#18
Posted 07 March 2012 - 07:38 PM
DAMN THOSE RAPPERS.- FUCK KONY !
Son of a bitch deserves to die !
Killing your family & being rapped..
I feel soo bad for all those families out there.
He needs to die A S A P.
Anyway, it just seems like the people posting on Kony are doing it out of a sense of guilt because I can bet a large majority of them don't give a fuck.
Wait a few weeks and the people screaming DIE KONY DIE will have forgotten about this.
#19
Posted 07 March 2012 - 07:56 PM
#20
Posted 09 March 2012 - 01:45 AM
and then
"Oh, America, why aren't you in Uganda, meddling in their affairs!?"
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users


Sign In
Create Account


Back to top













