Jump to content

Welcome to Emo Forums
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!
Photo

[Photoshop] Experiments


  • Please log in to reply
3 replies to this topic

#1
The Wardrobe

The Wardrobe

    Spiraling Tempest

  • Full Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 287 posts
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Australia
  • Country
  • Fav Band The Getaway Plan
  • Fav Song Requiem
Greetings,

Lately I have been studying Information Technology Studies at school and one of key components to this subject is the use of Adobe Programs, in this case we are speaking of Photoshop. In my spare time I have been doing tutorials and just fiddling around with photos that I have selected. I will state now that all photos used for this I had permission from the person/persons in it. I am basically posting some samples and comparisons to seek advice from any other Photoshop pros! Your advice or suggestions would be greatly appreciated. Please keep in mind that the more sophisticated edits were done in the actual program, any others that look more basic were done on a Photoshop iPhone express app.

Other photos such as the nebula wall paper or the pretty looking dotty one was just muck around with tutorials.

Enjoy,
Attached File  Blacke.jpg   59.68K   18 downloadsAttached File  Justice M.jpg   98.18K   20 downloadsAttached File  Wendy.jpg   64K   17 downloadsAttached File  Lukey.jpg   201.53K   16 downloadsAttached File  Jarred.jpg   50.46K   14 downloadsAttached File  Nebula.jpg   29.1K   16 downloadsAttached File  Tutorial.jpg   81.16K   17 downloadsAttached File  898.jpg   325.97K   18 downloads
Nanthia

#2
Steve 

Steve 

    King of modesty

  • Sub Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,444 posts
Well, some of these are good and look more professional, others look tacky and bad. The first image, for example, I don't understand why you put a grungy overlay on the guy. Fair enough taking the background out to focus things more on the guy himself, but the overlay was unnecessary really. The second one is better though, adding a more vibrant colour to his eyes and creating more detail in the background, though instead of just dumping a lens flare in the top corner as lighting, you should experiment with lighting effects (Filter > Render > Lighting Effects...) more.

What I usually do to add lighting is I create a new layer, get a brush tool, use a bright colour (for instance if I was trying to add lighting to a red car, I'd use a faded pinkish colour), set the hardness to 0% and just add a couple of highlights to the places I want the light to come from. Then I'd set the layer mode to "Color Dodge" and set the opacity to ~10-40% depending on how it looks. You can create some really cool effects using that technique.

As for the third picture, I think you overdid it with all the swirls and stars etc. To me, that effect only works if the subject is looking more confident and he/she is walking. Effects like that work best when the picture has motion to it, the girl is just static and she looks withdrawn too so I'd assume something more subtle would be more effective. The fourth picture looks like you just put a photo filter over it, marquee'd a border and set it to "feather" then brushed a black border around the edge of the photo. Fifth picture... Just... No, I don't like it.

The sixth and seventh images would look pretty cool as a wallpaper, admittedly. I especially like how you used a simple gradient in the background of the seventh image to bring out more of the colour on the bottom. What did you use here? My guess is a few neon/abstract brushes and a simple circle brush on a "scatter" effect to create the particle type things. The sixth image looks like a starry background picture with a lens flare in the centre and simple use of the line tool (?)

Finally, the eighth image: I don't like it. Maybe if you had rendered the girl a bit better and used less of an eyesore lens flare it would have been a lot better. It is a bitch though to cut around hair, especially when it's as 'fluffy' as the girl's hair is so I'm not surprised it didn't render well. Again with the starry background, there are other things in the universe you know :P You could have put her in a more natural environment, so the rendering didn't look so obvious. Oh and I'm guessing the grey part is either a downloaded grunge brush, or the default CS4/CS5 ones you get.

As for improving, just make sure you pay attention to the details. It gets easier to spot things as you continue to play around with it and look at other people's work so the best thing you can do is look at tutorial sites or register on a website like deviantART where you can look at other people's artwork as well as get some constructive criticism from others.

Here are some tutorials I use/have used in the past:
http://www.photoshop...ts-and-brushes/ - Some cool horror effects there
http://fc01.devianta...by_Senthrax.jpg - A forum signature tutorial, if you like making those.
http://www.sxc.hu/ - Where I sometimes get my stock images from. Most are free to use.
http://planetrenders.net/renders/ - Where I get renders, fractals and C4Ds from. The user created stuff is free to use, but be careful when looking for renders for game characters etc. Not all of them are free to use.
http://psd.tutsplus....gory/tutorials/ - A gold mine for photoshop tutorials, from small manipulations to actually drawing images.

#3
The Wardrobe

The Wardrobe

    Spiraling Tempest

  • Full Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 287 posts
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Australia
  • Country
  • Fav Band The Getaway Plan
  • Fav Song Requiem
Thanks for your advice and the link to the tutorials, I look forward to reading and doing them once my computer is fixed. The First image isn't a grunge overall but actually a smoke effect made from filter > Render> cloud but I understand what you mean. I think I was just going for something different. The second image was tough for me considering that I'm an absollute newbie with photoshop but I appreciate that extra tip. I'll note it done. As for the third image yes it is over done and the tutorial wasn't very clear, it was worded for someone who knew what they were doing, so I don't be doing that again. EVER. The third and fourth were done on the adobe photoshop express so editting was very limited, I might mention at this point I only have the CS2 version on my computer. The fifth and sixth were from an abstract wallpaper tutorial website.

I'll post the link here so it can answer your questions better. I'm not good at explaining things.

Nebula - http://abduzeedo.com/space-lighting-effects-10-steps-photoshop-tutorial

Scattered- http://9tutorials.com/2007/07/30/abstract-image.html

As for Reigan I did a few copies of that and I agree with you, the lens flare and stars ruined it. I do have the simpler copy though which I think it a lot better. Reigan always has fluffy hair and using the pen tool was difficult.

Attached File  Reigan (4)1.jpg   208.19K   9 downloads

#4
Steve 

Steve 

    King of modesty

  • Sub Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,444 posts

I might mention at this point I only have the CS2 version on my computer.

There's not a huge difference between CS2 and anything more recent (I don't know about CS6 though). You get a few less features but CS2 is a pretty solid version. I used that one for a long time, hell I learned how to use it using that program so it's not bad at all.

As for Reigan I did a few copies of that and I agree with you, the lens flare and stars ruined it. I do have the simpler copy though which I think it a lot better. Reigan always has fluffy hair and using the pen tool was difficult.

The hair is still off-putting. If you want to make it less noticeable, try to use a background with the same colours as the original background was, it masks it better. Not the best solution to that, but it works somewhat effectively if done correctly. Alternatively, you could use a 1px eraser, zoom in to 2000% and delete each unwanted pixel individually, but that's really tedious.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users